ещё немного о производительности хаскелла :)
- From
- Bulat Ziganshin (2:5093/4.126)
- To
- All (2:5054/37.63)
- Date
- 2005-05-06T20:28:10Z
- Area
- RU.PERL
* Originally in RU.PERL
Приятного тебе дня и незабываемой ночи, All!
вот то, о чём я упоминал:
=== Cut ===
To summarise the thread, the infamous "great language shootout" showed that Haskell placed last in the word count test. (Note that the benchmark results have since been updated with a new GHC-specific version of the solution, which is far uglier, but also about 60x faster than the original version.) The Ocaml guys went to town on this result, and of course claimed that Haskell was dreadfully inefficient, with a half-condescending remark at the end that "Haskell's approach has been expensive in terms of performance". The Haskell community ignites, and comes up with a version within a day or two that is twice as fast as GNU wc, which is more or less on par with the Ocaml wc version. This is good. However, two rather bad things stand out to me:
=== Cut ===
Bulat, mailto:bulatz-AT-fort.tatarstan.ru, ICQ: work 15872722, home 11849833
... Иногда для того, чтобы изменить свое восприятие мира,
... люди пытаются изменить сам мир
--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.2
* Origin: Чубайс Бессмертный - повелитель Тьмы (2:5093/4.126)
SEEN-BY: 450/208 452/25 100 454/9 455/15 461/33 74 106 640 464/34 465/204
SEEN-BY: 467/24 469/125 200 478/44 65 550/150 5068 4600/126 4614/9 4623/56
SEEN-BY: 4625/9 4626/100 4632/10 4635/99 1024 4641/444 4642/27 48 4657/50
SEEN-BY: 5001/50 5002/76 5002 5003/34 5010/53 146 5011/13 5015/4 28 214 5019/5
SEEN-BY: 5020/52 115 128 133 150 175 486 600 642 744 794 921 958 968 982 1100
SEEN-BY: 5020/1169 1212 1234 1626 1642 1653 1826 1829 1930 2044 2200 2345 2908
SEEN-BY: 5020/4400 4441 5021/2 5023/11 5024/1 73 5025/19 5030/69 195 382 436
SEEN-BY: 5030/611 920 1016 1039 1520 1688 5031/7 5032/11 20 5033/21 35 5034/8
SEEN-BY: 5035/38 63 5036/13 5037/21 36 5038/4 5040/33 47 5041/4 5045/7 42
SEEN-BY: 5047/47 5049/6 157 5050/9 41 5051/35 5053/16 38 5054/1 8 9 35 36 37
SEEN-BY: 5054/45 50 66 67 81 85 5055/177 5056/16 5058/77 5059/2 9 20 5060/90
SEEN-BY: 5062/4 7 5063/51 5064/7 35 5070/26 66 948 5071/22 5075/37 5077/70
SEEN-BY: 5079/49 5083/13 5090/23 105 5093/4 27 33 57 5096/18 5100/113 6023/1
SEEN-BY: 6033/2727 6070/5 6096/10
PATH: 5093/4 5020/52 5054/1 37